Traitement en cours

Veuillez attendre...

Paramétrages

Paramétrages

Aller à Demande

1. WO2020112061 - SYSTÈME DE PARTENARIAT ET D'INVESTISSEMENT BASÉ SUR UN NOUVEAU PARTAGE DE PROFIT


Avertissement La version image (PDF) disponible dans PATENTSCOPE est la version officielle. Cette version HTML en ligne est fournie pour aider les utilisateurs. Malgré le grand soin apporté à la compilation pour assurer une représentation précise et exacte des données figurant sur le document/les images imprimés, des erreurs et/ou des omissions ne peuvent pas être exclues en raison des processus de transmission et de conversion de données et des limitations inhérentes aux processus de traduction (éventuellement) automatique utilisés. Les liens hypertexte suivis de ce symbole sont associés à des ressources externes qui ne sont pas contrôlées par l'OMPI. L'OMPI décline toute responsabilité concernant les points mentionnés ci-dessus.

WRITTEN OPTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY
International application No. Applicant's or agent's file reference
PCT/TR2019/050972 KO-19-0072
International filing date (day/month/year) Priority date (day/month/year) Date of mailing (day/month/year)
19 November 2019 27 November 2018 06 July 2020
International Patent Classification (IPC) or both national classification and IPC
     G06Q 40/06 (2012.01)i
;
Applicant KOSE, Hikmet
1. This opinion contains indications relating to the following items:
Box No. I Basis of the opinion
Box No. II Priority
Box No. III Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
Box No. IV Lack of unity of invention
Box No. V Reasoned statement under Rule 43bis.1(a)(i) with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability; citations and explanations supporting such statement
Box No. VI Certain documents cited
Box No. VII Certain defects in the international application
Box No. VIII Certain observations on the international application
2. FOR FURTHER ACTION
If a demand for international preliminary examination is made, this opinion will be considered to be a written opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority (“IPEA”) except that this does not apply where the applicant chooses an Authority other than this one to be the IPEA and the chosen IPEA has notified the International Bureau under Rule 66.1 bis(b) that written opinions of this International Searching Authority will not be so considered.
If this opinion is, as provided above, considered to be a written opinion of the IPEA, the applicant is invited to submit to the IPEA a written reply together, where appropriate, with amendments, before the expiration of 3 months from the date of mailing of Form PCT/ISA/220 or before the expiration of 22 months from the priority date, whichever expires later.
For further options, see Form PCT/ISA/220.
Box No. I Basis of the opinion
1. With regard to the language, this opinion has been established on the basis of:
the international application in the language in which it was filed.
a translation of the international application into ___________________________ which is the language of a translation furnished for the purposes of international search (Rules 12.3(a) and 23.1(b)).
2.
This opinion has been established taking into account the rectification of an obvious mistake authorized by or notified to this Authority under Rule 91 (Rule 43bis.1(a)).
3. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the international application, this opinion has been established on the basis of a sequence listing:
a. forming part of the international application as filed:
in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file.
on paper or in the form of an image file.
b. furnished together with the international application under PCT Rule 13ter.1(a) for the purposes of international search only in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file.
c. furnished subsequent to the international filing date for the purposes of international search only:
in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file (Rule 13ter.1(a)).
on paper or in the form of an image file (Rule 13ter.1(b) and Administrative Instructions, Section 713).
4.
In addition, in the case that more than one version or copy of a sequence listing has been filed or furnished, the required statements that the information in the subsequent or additional copies is identical to that forming part of the application as filed or does not go beyond the application as filed, as appropriate, were furnished.
5. Additional comments:
Box No. III Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability
The questions whether the claimed invention appears to be novel, to involve an inventive step (to be non obvious), or to be industrially applicable have not been examined in respect of:
the entire international application.
claims Nos.                                                   
because:
the said international application, or the said claims Nos. 1-6 relate to the following subject matter which does not require an international search (specify):
All the claims of the international application, relate to a business model and a mental act which provides an accounting model to share the profit which is gained from the investment and to calculate the share of the profit, the amount of the time, which is spent in the investment, is used. Therefore, there is not any technical feature in the claims which contributes to the invention. Therefore the international application falls within the category of schemes, rules or methods of doing business, performing purely mental acts and within the scope of PCT Rule 39.1(iii) for which no international search is required; accordingly no search is conducted.
the description, claims or drawings (indicate particular elements below) or said claims Nos. ________________________ are so unclear that no meaningful opinion could be formed (specify):
the claims, or said claims Nos. ________________________________________________ are so inadequately supported by the description that no meaningful opinion could be formed (specify):
no international search report has been established for said claims Nos. _________________________________________
a meaningful opinion could not be formed without the sequence listing; the applicant did not, within the prescribed time limit:
furnish a sequence listing in the form of an Annex C/ST.25 text file, and such listing was not available to the International Searching Authority in the form and manner acceptable to it; or the sequence listing furnished did not comply with the standard provided for in Annex C of the Administrative Instructions.
furnish a sequence listing on paper or in the form of an image file complying with the standard provided for in Annex C of the Administrative Instructions, and such listing was not available to the International Searching Authority in the form and manner acceptable to it; or the sequence listing furnished did not comply with the standard provided for in Annex C of the Administrative Instructions.
pay the required late furnishing fee for the furnishing of a sequence listing in response to an invitation under Rule 13ter.1(a) or (b).
See Supplemental Box for further details.
Name and mailing address of the ISA/:
Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (Turkpatent)
Hipodrom Caddesi No. 13 06560 Yenimahalle Ankara,
Turkey
Telephone No. (90-312) 303 11 82
Facsimile No. +903123031220
Date of completion of this opinion:
06 July 2020
Authorized officer:
Faruk ÖNDER
Telephone No.
Facsimile No.