(12) International Application Status Report

Received at International Bureau: 25 June 2018 (25.06.2018)

Information valid as of: 18 December 2018 (18.12.2018)

Report generated on: 21 March 2019 (21.03.2019)

(10) Publication number: (43) Publication date: (26) Publication language:
WO 2019/00978010 January 2019 (10.01.2019) English (EN)

(21) Application number: (22) Filing date: (25) Filing language:
PCT/SE2018/05065219 June 2018 (19.06.2018) English (EN)

(31) Priority number(s): (32) Priority date(s): (33) Priority status:
1750885-4 (SE)05 July 2017 (05.07.2017) Priority document received (in compliance with PCT Rule 17.1)

(51) International Patent Classification:
G06Q 30/02 (2012.01); G08B 25/00 (2006.01); G06Q 50/26 (2012.01)

(71) Applicant(s):
IRISITY AB [SE/SE]; Lindholmspiren 7 SE-417 56 GÖTEBORG (SE) (for all designated states)

(72) Inventor(s):
BÄCKLUND, Marcus; Månvägen 17 SE-181 51 LIDINGÖ (SE)
HAGELBÄCK, Victor; Nederstevägen 17 SE-449 30 NÖDINGE (SE)

(74) Agent(s):
KRANSELL & WENNBORG KB; P.O. Box 2096 SE-403 12 GÖTEBORG (SE)

(54) Title (EN): METHOD FOR APPLY GAMIFICATION TECHNIQUES TO A SECURITY SYSTEM
(54) Title (FR): PROCÉDÉ D'APPLICATION DE TECHNIQUES DE LUDIFICATION À UN SYSTÈME DE SÉCURITÉ

(57) Abstract:
(EN): The present disclosure relates to a computer implemented method for applying gamification techniques to a security system. The security system comprises a server connected to a computing device associated with a user/operator. The user/operator has an assigned user skill level. The server receives notifications of security events that need to be handled and based on the events determines tasks to be performed, each task associated with a task skill level. The server assigns a task to the user and receives a notification when the task is completed. Based on the task, the task skill level and the user skill level the server determines a score of performance of the task for the user.
(FR): L'invention concerne un procédé mis en Ĺ“uvre par ordinateur permettant d'appliquer des techniques de ludification à un système de sécurité. Le système de sécurité comprend un serveur connecté à un dispositif informatique associé à un utilisateur/opérateur. L'utilisateur/opérateur possède un niveau de compétence d'utilisateur attribué. Le serveur reçoit des notifications d'événements de sécurité qui doivent être gérés et, d'après les événements, détermine les tâches à exécuter, chaque tâche étant associée à un niveau de compétence de tâche. Le serveur attribue une tâche à l'utilisateur et reçoit une notification lorsque la tâche est terminée. D'après la tâche, le niveau de compétence de la tâche et le niveau de compétence de l'utilisateur, le serveur détermine un score d'exécution de la tâche pour l'utilisateur.

International search report:
Received at International Bureau: 03 October 2018 (03.10.2018) [SE]

International Report on Patentability (IPRP) Chapter II of the PCT:
Not available

(81) Designated States:
AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW
European Patent Office (EPO) : AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TR
African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) : BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG
African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) : BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW
Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) : AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, TM

Declarations:
Declaration made as applicant's entitlement, as at the international filing date, to apply for and be granted a patent (Rules 4.17(ii) and 51bis.1(a)(ii)), in a case where the declaration under Rule 4.17(iv) is not appropriate